It is difficult to believe that a man
born over two hundred years ago can help with our current economic challenges,
but such is the legacy of Alexander Hamilton. Following America’s separation
from the Old World, Secretary of the Treasury Hamilton unveiled a plan that
would become the economic backbone of the United States. However, somewhere
down the line, this vision began to fade to the dim pages of history books.
This transition can be traced to the strength of Hamilton’s most prized pupil:
Manufacturing. The United States has been severely lacking in manufacturing
prowess ever since the opportunity to export labor combined with ever
increasing technological capabilities. A strong manufacturing presence has been
hailed by all as a strong contributor to employment, which at the end of the
day, is our most important economic factor. While Mr. Hamilton’s plan involved
tariffs that ensured the competitiveness of American manufacturing, I do not
believe in an exact recreation of Hamilton’s plan. Attempting to artificially
ensure the competitiveness of the American manufacturing industry would raise
consumer prices and stifle American industry from staying competitive in an
increasingly globalized world. In order to grow the economy Hamilton style,
there has to be a less literal reading of his Report on Manufactures.
In order to transfer jobs and economic
power to the United States, technology must lead the way. While technological
advances have traditionally replaced wage earners in production, the proper
social and economic impact will spring from the coupling of technology with
man’s access to use such technology. On the national scale this means a more
fruitful climate for entrepreneurship. The days of one factory employing an
entire town are gone. However, a town employed by many small innovative
companies would result in a more empowering and productive job market. This
shift can be achieved through Hamiltonian protective subsidies to
entrepreneurial ventures and increased support for technological research that
would empower the entrepreneurial spirit. I am not advocating for the
government to pick winners and losers among upstart businesses, however, I believe
that a larger safety net for entrepreneurial ventures and increased access to
credit would help spread entrepreneurial ventures.
It is well known that successful
entrepreneurs reap the largest financial benefits along with the freedom to
implement their own vision on society. So then, why is everyone not an
entrepreneur? Well for starters, not everyone wants to run a for profit or non
profit venture. However, those would like to are usually discouraged by the
risk involved with starting a business. Decreasing these risks (but not
eliminating them) through the aforementioned remedies would attract financially
ambitious individuals who can successfully establish healthy start up
businesses. These established businesses would be able to create jobs on the
local level and give our country a strong economic base.
Hamiltonian protectionism of American
entrepreneurship would sway some ambitious profit seekers from squeezing into
the financial services sector and instead establishing their own venture that
would both enrich themselves and create numerous jobs in their community. We
must foster invention and creation in the American individual in order to raise
our standard of living. Empowering individuals to raise themselves and their
community to a higher standard is the ultimate American dream. The days of
working in a single factory for your whole life and retiring to your own slice
of the pie are ending. The future of the “American dream” will lie in a more
flexible relationship with entrepreneurship and inventiveness.
No comments:
Post a Comment